Society of the Friends of the Text: its members would have nothing in common (for there is no necessary agreement on the texts of pleasure) but their enemies: fools of all kinds, who decree foreclosure of the text and of its pleasure, either by cultural conformism or by intransigent rationalism (suspecting a "mystique" of literature) or by political moralism or by criticism of the signifier or by stupid pragmatism or by snide vacuity or by destruction of the discourse, loss of verbal desire. Such a society would have no site, could function only in total atopia; yet it would be a kind of phalanstery, for in it contradictions would be acknowledged (and the risks of ideological imposture thereby restricted), difference would be observed, and conflict rendered insignificant (being unproductive of pleasure).

Roland Barthes, The Pleasure of the Text, translated by Richard Miller (Hill and Wang, 1975), pp. 14-15.

Chimera

风险、金融和神经系统：论“动态清零”，普遍手册，2022年11月

“直言”发生时：谈王拓的《第二次审问》，歧路批评，2024年12月

G.H.

两种演唱：P.K.14与海朋森，歧路批评，2024年11月

艺术/仍然是国家里/最普遍的/那一种便秘，歧路批评，2024年7月

挂在盒子上：一颗红色彗星，歧路批评，2023年8月

Weitian Liu

[interview]与工艺的访谈|为什么是漫画？，歧路批评，2024年2月

[Review]反民族志的零度记录--评王兵《青春(春)》，ArtReview Chinese Edition Spring 2024

[Review]致颖，Artforum中文网，2023年7月

[Essay]双重束缚的解：一次练习，歧路批评，2023年11月